Over the span of a month, I recently wrote a series of universally correct essays about the implications of LLM on value-based design. The short answer is “minimal”, but describing why took a minute.
Since then, LLM has only become more controversial. Some people are very mad about it, and some people are very enthusiastic about it. Candidly, I got a lot less excited about LLM since I wrote those essays. This happened for a lot of reasons, and one of them is because I discovered that they are the primary reason for electric bills spiking in America. In fact, my own electric bills have doubled, despite my overall electrical usage declining year-over-year. That has never happened to me before. In fact, it probably shouldn’t happen at all, right?
I think for a while, a lot of us took one look at the projected climate impact of LLM and shrugged. I think that is considerably less defensible of a position these days. Building a squillion data centers and hoovering up the collected output of the human experiment is something we are allowing to happen by supporting LLM companies. It’s not a good look.
Practically speaking, I don’t feel great about using LLM unless it’s with models that I can run on my own computers – and only for relatively simple tasks. I definitely don’t feel great about LLM replacing search, or LLM being used to do all sorts of crazy sinister things like deepfakes, artistic infringement, or replacing your therapist or girlfriend.